However, the authors of both tests concluded that the improved performance on wood likely would be largely irrelevant in real-world conditions. In contemporary tests, similar results were found, with the M14 only significantly outperforming the M16 on wood (as well as during separate 55-gallon barrel tests). The Hitch report shows largely similar results between the AR and M14 on most material penetration tests, with the exception of penetration on pine boards at 500 yards, where the M14 outperformed the AR. So, what is the M14 good at? Some say that the 7.62 NATO round has superior penetration against materials. Army NCO with four combat tours and extensive experience as a marksmanship instructor, describes stripping down the M14 EBR to clean them prior to a deployment and tripling the inaccuracy of the guns, from 1 MOA to 3 MOA, as the chassis had to be precisely torqued together for the guns to be accurate. These rifles proved to just be as finicky as the older M14s and M21s.Īsh Hess, a former U.S. Army’s “new” marksman rifle, the M14 EBR-RI. The same story was unfortunately repeated many years later when M14s were brought out of retirement and placed in new metal Sage chassis to be the U.S. Army Special Forces Weapons Sergeant, describes it as “a fiddly, unstable platform” that they were not even allowed to field strip for fear of disrupting the internal tuning of the weapon that allowed it to be accurate. One expert with hands-on experience with the M21, the late Kevin “Hognose” O’Brien, a former U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |